18 Leaders Loop skills on strategy & competitive advantage. Read each one, then prove it with a short Skill Check to build toward your Leaders Loop Credentials.
Most strategies don't fail at the whiteboard. They fail in the long, quiet gap between the plan and the work, and cascading goals are the most practical bridge anyone has built across it.
Four words that get used interchangeably and shouldn't be. Here's what each one actually does, why the distinction changes behaviour, and how to write ones that survive contact with a Tuesday.
Your profit doesn't come from "the business", it comes from a handful of specific activities inside it. Porter's value chain is the tool that tells you which ones, and the value system tells you where the rest of your advantage is hiding next door.
A good quarter is not a moat. Defensibility is the structural reason a competitor who copies your product still cannot copy your profits, and most businesses have less of it than they think.
"What's our strategy?" is really three questions wearing one coat. Pull them apart, which businesses to be in, how each one wins, and how the functions deliver it, and most of the confusion in the room disappears.
Three classic directions a business can grow, into new products, up or down its own supply chain, or sideways into rivals. The hard part isn't naming them. It's knowing which one actually creates value, and which one quietly destroys it.
Knowing what your rivals ship is the easy part. The skill is telling the difference between a gap worth closing and a feature you only think you need, and not handing your strategy over to the competitor with the longest roadmap.
A single financial number tells you how you played last quarter; it can't tell you whether you'll win the next one. The Balanced Scorecard and its strategy map exist to fix that, by forcing a team to write down, on one page, how its everyday work is supposed to turn into results.
Four classic strategy diagnostics: what each one actually measures, where each one quietly fails, and the decision each is supposed to produce. Used well they sharpen a conversation; used badly they replace one.
Most strategy looks outward, at markets, rivals and trends. The resource-based view turns the telescope around and asks a sharper question: what do we already own that competitors can't easily copy, and are we actually organised to use it?
Most strategy decks describe a position. They rarely show you the terrain. Wardley mapping is the cheap, drawable habit that puts the terrain on a single page, so you can argue about the move instead of guessing at it.
Two methods for stress-testing a strategy against a future you can't predict, one that rehearses the world, one that rehearses your rivals. Used well, neither tries to tell you what will happen; both change what you'd do when it does.
Two questions decide whether a foreign launch survives its first eighteen months: how you go in, and how much you change once you're there. Here is how to answer both without betting the company on a hunch.
A strategy almost never fails on the slide. It fails in the gap between the slide and everything else, the structure, the incentives, the habits, and the 7S framework is a forty-year-old tool for finding that gap before it finds you.
Three words that get used interchangeably and mean three very different things. Get them straight and you stop pouring effort into the parts of your offer that can never win you a customer.
A strategy is not a goal, a plan, or a list of priorities. It's a set of joined-up choices about where you'll compete and how you'll win there, and it's only real if it forces you to give something up.
Most strategy assumes you must choose: stand out, or come in cheap. Value innovation is the claim that the best market-creating moves refuse the choice, and do both at once.
Two of the most-taught ideas in strategy, in plain English: how to read the competitive pressure on an industry, why Porter says you have to pick how you'll win, and where both ideas stop being reliable.
Leaders Loop
